How will quantum attacks affect the cryptographic algorithms used in GCUL (e.g. SHA-256, ECDSA)? What quantum-resistant cryptographic mechanisms need to be implemented and what quantum-resistant encryption and digital signature protocols are optimal for use in GCUL given scalability and performance requirements?

Quantum attacks, particularly those leveraging Shor’s algorithm, will severely compromise classical cryptographic algorithms used in GCUL like SHA-256 and ECDSA by efficiently solving the mathematical problems (integer factorization and elliptic curve discrete logarithm) underpinning their security. Symmetric algorithms like AES face a quadratic speedup threat from Grover’s algorithm, effectively halving their key strength, so SHA-256 and AES-128 need to be upgraded in strength to AES-256 or SHA-512 to maintain security.

To counteract these quantum threats, GCUL must implement quantum-resistant (post-quantum) cryptographic mechanisms. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has selected post-quantum cryptographic algorithms that are strong candidates for deployment. Among them:

  • Lattice-based cryptography (e.g., CRYSTALS-Kyber for encryption and CRYSTALS-Dilithium for digital signatures) offers strong quantum resistance, good scalability, and balanced performance.
  • Hash-based signature schemes are also promising for quantum resistance, though typically with larger signature sizes.
  • Other approaches like code-based and multivariate polynomial cryptography exist but often have larger key sizes or lower efficiency.

For a system like GCUL, which needs to balance scalability, performance, and security, lattice-based encryption and signature algorithms (CRYSTALS-Kyber and CRYSTALS-Dilithium) are currently optimal choices. They provide practical performance for large-scale deployment and are finalists in the NIST post-quantum cryptography standardization project, indicating readiness for near-term adoption. Upgrading symmetric encryption to AES-256 and hash functions to SHA-512 (or adopting quantum-resistant hash functions) is also necessary to mitigate Grover’s algorithm effects.

Summary:

  • Classical algorithms SHA-256 and ECDSA in GCUL are vulnerable to quantum attacks.
  • AES key sizes need to be doubled to remain secure.
  • Quantum-resistant encryption/signature protocols like CRYSTALS-Kyber and CRYSTALS-Dilithium are optimal for GCUL due to scalability and performance.
  • Transition to post-quantum cryptography should begin proactively to secure GCUL against future quantum adversaries.

This solution aligns with current research and standards aiming to secure digital infrastructure against imminent quantum computing capabilities.

By